Helmut Koers
2014-08-21 08:15:09 UTC
Hi,
I have recognized huge differences in regards to the time it takes to
complete a scan, which has the same target, port list and scan config
configured.
When looking at the processes being executed by a scan configured as below
with the default, non changeable port lists and scan configs and the same
target ip addresses,
Target: /24 address range that does not reply to ping requests
Port List: OpenVAS Default
Scan Config: Fast and Full
I recognized "testing 'ip-address'" processes on one OpenVAS installation
only, where I see lots of "testing 'ip-address'
/var/lib/openvas/plugins/nmap_net/gb_nmap_xxxxx.nasl" on another OpenVAS
system. Both are running OpenVAS 6 with the latest updates and feeds.
Both installations have been installed and run on the same hardware, but
on separate hard disks.
Does anyone know if there is a setting that is causing the .nasl's being
executed on one but not on the other installation, or what else may be the
reason?
Thanks,
Helmut
I have recognized huge differences in regards to the time it takes to
complete a scan, which has the same target, port list and scan config
configured.
When looking at the processes being executed by a scan configured as below
with the default, non changeable port lists and scan configs and the same
target ip addresses,
Target: /24 address range that does not reply to ping requests
Port List: OpenVAS Default
Scan Config: Fast and Full
I recognized "testing 'ip-address'" processes on one OpenVAS installation
only, where I see lots of "testing 'ip-address'
/var/lib/openvas/plugins/nmap_net/gb_nmap_xxxxx.nasl" on another OpenVAS
system. Both are running OpenVAS 6 with the latest updates and feeds.
Both installations have been installed and run on the same hardware, but
on separate hard disks.
Does anyone know if there is a setting that is causing the .nasl's being
executed on one but not on the other installation, or what else may be the
reason?
Thanks,
Helmut